Joint american-russian project with participation of:
American University in MoscowKontinent USARussia House
American-Russian relations: from confrontation to alliance
Last updated: 3 September 2010

::Book Review

Edward Lozansky and Sergei Roy

 Foreword

Russia Yesterday and Today is a brief manual or encyclopedia purporting to provide the reader with up-to-date information on personalities, political, economic, cultural and social structures, institutions, regions, and various features and phenomena that are believed to be important for understanding the current events in this country and their background. In the very nature of such publications, RY&T is fast overtaken by events, including sad ones like deaths of various personalities listed here, or political, economic and other developments, the rise and fall of institutions, etc. Needless to say every effort will be made to keep the record as relevant to the situation in the country as possible.

As the reader will see, we have endeavored to be strictly factual, although some of the characteristics, especially of personalities, may be deemed more subjective than is usual in publications of this kind. The fact is that this country is in a period of rapid transition, nay, continuous upheaval, and no one writing on these subjects at such a time can pretend to be entirely above the fray. In this day and age a preeminently cautious, “objective” stance may even be seen as a sign of pusillanimity or hypocrisy. That said, every precaution has been taken here to use only those materials that have appeared in easily verifiable sources, both printed and electronic.

 

 

 

 


ABALKIN , LEONID IVANOVICH; ABDRASHITOV , VADIM YUSUPOVICH;   ABDULOV , ALEXANDER GAVRILOVICH;   ABKHAZIA; ABRAMOVICH , ROMAN ARKADYEVICH; ADAMOVICH , ALES; AGRO-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX; AKCHURIN , RENAT SULEIMANOVICH; AKHMADULINA , BELLA AKHATOVNA; AKSENOV , VASILY PAVLOVICH; AKUNIN , BORIS; ALCOHOLISM; ALEKPEROV , VAGIT YUSUFOVICH;   ALEXY II; ALKHANOV, ALU (ALI) DADASHEVICH; ANDROPOV, YURI VLADIMIROVICH;ANPILOV , VIKTOR IVANOVICH; ANTI-SEMITISM;  ANTONOVA, IRINA ALEXANDROVNA; ARMENIA; AVEN , PYOTR OLEGOVICH;


BRODSKY, IOSIF ALEXANDROVICH; BAKLANOV, OLEG DMITRIEVICH; BALTIC STATES; BASAEV, SHAMIL SALMANOVICH; BASHKORTOSTAN; BATURINA, YELENA NIKOLAEVNA; BELARUS; BELKOVSKY, STANISLAV ALEXANDROVICH; BELOVEZHYE ACCORDS; BEREZOVSKY, BORIS ABRAMOVICH; BOBKOV, PHILIP DENISOVICH;BOLSHEVIK;

 

 


CENTER; CHECHNYA, CHECHEN REPUBLIC; CHERNOBYL DISASTER; CHUBAIS, ANATOLY BORISOVICH; COMMONWEALTH OF INDEPENDENT STATES (CIS); CONGRESS OF PEOPLE’S DEPUTIES OF RUSSIA; CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION; CONSTITUTION OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION;  COOPERATIVES IN A SOCIETY IN TRANSITION; CORRUPTION IN RUSSIA; COUNCIL OF MINISTERS; COUP OF 1991; COUP OF 1993; COMMUNIST PARTY OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION (CPRF); COMMUNIST PARTY OF THE SOVIET UNION (CPSU).


Based on over sixteen years of successful business in the evolving new Russia, Fred Andresen has written a book that is mandatory for all who plan to work there, make a serious visit, or just curious.   Written with insight, understanding, and a rare degree of humor, he tells us about working with and enjoying the Russians.

From Afghanistan and Iraq to Europe and the United States we are engaged in one of the most heated wars of all time. In his newest book, Walid Phares shows that the most important battle is actually taking place in the hearts and minds of the world's population. This is the war of ideas, where ideology is the most powerful weapon of all. He explores the beliefs of two opposing camps, one standing for democracy and human rights, and the other rejecting the idea of an international community and calling for jihad against the West. He reveals the strategies of both sides, explaining that new technologies and the growing media savvy of the jihadists have raised the stakes in the conflict. And most urgently, he warns that the West is in danger of losing the war.

This is an indispensable book for anyone wondering what sort of changes to expect in U.S. foreign policy should the Democrats retake the White House later this year. Nye (The Paradox of American Power, etc.), now dean of Harvard's Kennedy School of Government, was an assistant secretary of defense in the Clinton administration. The go-it-alone approach, Nye argues, has led to an unprecedented drop in support for the U.S. abroad, which leaves us scrambling to rebuild Iraq almost singlehandedly, overstretching ourselves militarily and economically. It also hampers efforts to secure the voluntary cooperation of foreign governments essential to dismantling terrorist cells spread throughout the globe. The answer, Nye says, lies in a return to the mix of soft and hard power that cemented the Western alliance and won the Cold War.

Could it really be that the United States spent decades cultivating Islamists? And that it manipulated and double-crossed them, cynically using and misusing them as Cold War allies? And that all of this spawned a force that turned against its sponsor with a vengeance? Robert Dreyfuss argues just that in «Devil’s Game.» Like monsters imbued with artificial life, radical imams, mullahs and ayatollahs stalk the landscape, thundering not only against the United States — but against freedom of thought, against secular science, against nationalism and the left, against women’s rights. We should be mindful of that troubling history. When we now fear all those Islamists, we do well to remember just who helped spawn them.


America-Russia.net
When President Bush declared war on terrorism, he did not, legally, put the country on a war footing. Up until now, we have never accurately named the enemy or the danger. If the government can't speak the real name and nature of the enemy, it becomes impossible to explain, or even design, a policy for victory. This is why Mr. Bush -- who has tried to talk around the problem of radical Islam -- has seemed (to his critics) foolish or deceitful, neither of which he is.

The study seeks to point out ways that a truly irenic American global strategy needs to work more diligently to resolve a number of the crucial geo-political conflicts so as to minimize the real possibility of wider regional conflicts, if not that of major power war. It is argued that homo geopoliticus is entering a "danger zone" over the next 50 years in which the risks of war will be heightened in disputes over burgeoning world energy and resource demand, shifts in technological capabilities, coupled with conflicting geostrategic, military-technological and political-economic interests, as well as considerations of state power and influence.
 1    2  »
Konstantin Bogdanov

The Second World War formally ended on September 2, 1945 with Japan’s surrender. There is a popular saying that a war is over when the last soldiers killed are buried. With WWII, however, things aren’t so simple.

The Second World War was a beast born of WWI, known in Europe as the Great War. Some alternative historians see them as two phases in the same war, separated by a fragile truce. This seems logical: For thirty years, the world tried to destroy itself in trenches and gas chambers, at logging sites and in slums blighted by misery and unemployment. It measured the shapes of skulls and class distinctions, and meticulously calculated the percentage of Jewish or Japanese blood in people destined for death camps or internment camps.

Vladimir Mukhin

The Commonwealth is entering a period of geopolitical struggle with NATO and the United States for control over the territory of the erstwhile Soviet Union and nearby countries. The Alliance mounted an energetic campaign to enlist the services of post- Soviet republics in performance of its own military-political missions in the region. Russia’s geopolitical interests are in danger. Outperformed at every turn, the international structures it established in the region (CIS Collective Security Treaty Organization or CSTO and Shanghai Cooperation Organization) become virtual.

Exercise Peace Mission’2010 of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization is to be launched in Kazakhstan on September 10. There appear to be no particular reason to run the exercise save for the necessity to show that the Shanghai Cooperation Organization is still there.

Javier Blas, Courtney Weaver, Simon Mundy

Russia announced a 12-month extension of its grain export ban on Thursday, raising fears about a return to the food shortages and riots of 2007-08 which spread through developing countries dependent on imports.

The announcement by Vladimir Putin came as the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organisation called an emergency meeting to discuss the wheat shortage, and riots in Mozambique left seven dead.

© "America-Russia.net". American-Russian alliance. All Rights Reserved.
Editorial Office in USA: 1800 Connecticut Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20009; Tel. 202-364-0200; Fax 240-554-1650; e-mail: russia@russiahouse.org
Site supported by: Kontinent USA 2009
Rambler's Top100 Рейтинг@Mail.ru