Joint american-russian project with participation of:
American University in MoscowKontinent USARussia House
American-Russian relations: from confrontation to alliance
Last updated: 8 February 2012

::Geopolitics

The presidential race in the USA: what could be the Russia's stake?

The presidential race in the USA: what could be the Russia's stake?
January 13, 2008
Edward LOZANSKY, President, American University in Moscow

The presidential race in the United States is gaining momentum. Both parties now have their crop of leaders and outsiders. Not surprisingly, these developments are being closely watched and analyzed in Russia with a view to identifying the contender with whom it would be preferable to do business in the future. This is no simple task, as the candidates’ election rhetoric is not always consistent with what they will actually do on settling in the White House. Nevertheless, some conclusions can already be drawn.

The least welcome candidate, from Moscow’s standpoint, is apparently Senator John McCain (R-AZ), who won the important New Hampshire primary. He is the fiercest critic of Russia and its President.   McCain branded Russia “revanchist” and Putin “a dangerous person.”   He keeps calling for a new tough line on Russia and repeatedly said that Russia should be expelled from the G8. The West, tells McCain, should send Russia a clear signal that NATO doors remained open to all democracies, referring, no doubt, to Ukraine and Georgia.

As for the Democratic Party, its list of Kremlin undesirables is apparently topped by Hillary Clinton who likewise won the New Hampshire primary. Recently Ms. Clinton, forgetting the ABCs of diplomatic etiquette, went so far as to fling a personal insult at the Russian president, saying that he, as a former KGB agent, did not have a soul, and she was unable to understand how George Bush had managed to discern one. This looks very much like plagiarizing McCain’s ideas, for he beat her to it by saying a few days earlier that when he looked into Putin’s eyes all he could see there were three letters: a K, a G, and a B. At the same time, though, Hillary told earlier that what interested her most was what Russia did outside its borders and that she did not think she could, as the president of the United States, “wave my hand and tell the Russian people they should have a different government.” Typical Clinton doubletalk.

The other candidates do not stoop to personal insults and are more circumspect in criticizing Russia, also calling for cooperation with this country, first and foremost in the matter of nuclear arms reduction and nonproliferation.

Thus Barack Obama (D-IL) said that Russia was “neither our enemy nor close ally,” and if elected, he would make it his priority to take US and Russian ballistic missiles “off high-trigger alert and to dramatically reduce the stockpiles of our nuclear weapons and material.”

Possibly the only candidate who is optimistic about US-Russian relations is Republican ex-governor of Arkansas Mike Huckabee. “Things will be better than during the Cold War because, much as we do not want another 9/11, Putin does not want another terrorist attack like the 2004 school siege in Beslan,” he wrote in a January 2008 Foreign Affairs essay.

A close look at the standpoints of other active and influential US politicians suggests that the most acceptable option for the Kremlin would be Senator Chuck Hagel (R-Neb). In his program speeches he emphasizes that America is currently plagued with a lot of foreign policy problems, and the most important of them, above all in Iran, cannot be addressed except in close cooperation with Russia. Moreover, Hagel says relationships with Russia are critical to U.S. security. As for Russia’s domestic affairs, he avoids mentioning them at all, thus implying that they are of little interest to him.

However, to Moscow’s regret, Hagel is not in the running, though his chances would be reasonably good. This year he also decided not to seek re-election to the Senate, though at 62 he is relatively young for a politician. McCain, incidentally, is 71. This week Hagel is coming to Moscow where he will give several talks and meet with Russian scholars, businessmen and officials.

At the recent meeting with the senator at the Washington Center for Strategic and International Studies, which I attended, Hagel, responding to calls for him to join in the race for the White House, hinted broadly that he did not rule this out at all. If so, he must have meant the 2012 election.

Editorial
As Russia and the United States prepare for their respective presidential elections, tensions between the countries are growing. The central point of contention is U.S. ballistic missile defense (BMD) plans. Russia has several levers, including its ability to cut off supply lines to the NATO-led war effort in Afghanistan, to use in the standoff over BMD, but the United States could retaliate by supporting the current protests in Russia. Moscow is willing to escalate tensions with Washington but will not push the crisis to the point where relations could formally break.
Keyur Patel
High quality global journalism requires investment. Please share this article with others using the link below, do not cut & paste the article. See our Ts&Cs and Copyright Policy for more detail. Russia released a preliminary estimate for 2011 GDP growth on Tuesday - and at 4.3 per cent, it looks pretty healthy. The figure crept ahead of analyst expectations, buoyed by a strong recovery in consumer demand over the year, while 2010 growth was revised upwards, also to 4.3 per cent. Renaissance Capital was cautiously bullish, calling the forecast 'reason for a (modest) celebration'.
© "America-Russia.net". American-Russian alliance. All Rights Reserved.
Editorial Office in USA: 1800 Connecticut Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20009; Tel. 202-364-0200; Fax 240-554-1650; e-mail: russia@russiahouse.org
Site supported by: Kontinent USA and American University in Moscow ,2011
Rambler's Top100 Рейтинг@Mail.ru