Joint american-russian project with participation of:
American University in MoscowKontinent USARussia House
American-Russian relations: from confrontation to alliance
Last updated: 8 February 2012

::Geopolitics

Obama or McCain - no difference to Russia?

Obama or McCain - no difference to Russia?
October 23, 2008
Edward LOZANSKY, President, American University in Moscow

Less than two weeks before the presidential elections all indicators are pointing to a landslide, or a near-landslide victory by Obama. There is always a chance for last minute surprises, but miracles are rare things. I think the main reason for McCain’s most likely defeat is this: too many influential groups within his own Republican party never regarded him as the best choice available.

We are not talking here only about hard-core conservatives, far right and Christian right. Even moderates, such as the hugely admired former Secretary of State Gen. Collin Powell, have turned away from McCain. Gen. Powell said he was dismayed by the tenor of McCain’s campaign and not quite thrilled by his choice of Gov. Sarah Palin for running mate – and who could blame the general but the most ardent Sarah Barracuda fans?

Powell’s endorsement of Obama offered great relief to me personally since I always considered myself to be a loyal Republican who not only always voted for GOP candidates but even formed the “Russians for Reagan”, and Russians for the two Bushes and Dole groups. I was definitely not going to put together a similar group for McCain since I believe that his misguided rhetoric on Russia is harmful to U.S. interests and dangerous to the world. Being in the same company as Gen. Powell definitely eases the pricks of my Republican conscience

As for Obama, I am sure his election will be most welcome in Europe and the rest of the world and will definitely help improve relations with our allies and America’s image in general. However, when it comes to U.S. – Russia relations one should not expect any drastic changes for the better unless Obama thoroughly overhauls his foreign policy team. The current line of his official and self-proclaimed advisors on Russia is as bad as McCain’s; in some respects, even worse.

His Vice-President Joe Biden is also not much better on Russia than Sarah Palin. Besides lobbying in the middle of a huge financial crisis for providing one billion dollars to his good friend President Saakashvili of Georgia, Biden is known for blocking the lifting of the Jackson-Vanik amendment unless Moscow guarantees large purchases of American chicken meat. I have always naively assumed that the Jackson – Vanik amendment to a 1974 trade law was about free emigration from what then was the Soviet Union. Now, the evil empire has been gone for 17 years and Russia freely permits emigration to whosoever asks for it without any restrictions – but the Jackson—Vanik amendment lives on. I wonder what Henry Scoop Jackson and Charles Vanik, who co-authored that amendment, would have to say about this chicken-meat approach to human rights issues. This outdated obstacle to trade engenders resentment in Russia, blocks its admission to WTO, and harms U.S. economic and diplomatic ties with that country.

Before making any long-term projections, we will have to see who Obama’s choice will be for Secretary of State and for National Security Advisor. There is a long list of knowledgeable and respected professionals who can do an excellent job. That list would include Gen. Collin Powell, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, former U.S. Ambassador to Moscow and now Undersecretary of State William Burns, Head of the Russian and Eurasian Programs at CSIS Andrew Kuchins, Director of the Carnegie office in Moscow Rose Gottemoeller, and quite a few others. I’d also advise Obama to create an informal Kitchen Cabinet, similar to Ronald Reagan’s, with people of the types like James Baker, Henry Kissinger, Sam Nunn, Chuck Hagel, just to name a few.

Making up such lists is quite an enjoyable occupation, but somehow I am not too sanguine about Obama’s future selections. As for the present, he is clearly surrounded by people who may yet make the Kremlin feel nostalgic for the good old days of the Bush administration.



Editorial
As Russia and the United States prepare for their respective presidential elections, tensions between the countries are growing. The central point of contention is U.S. ballistic missile defense (BMD) plans. Russia has several levers, including its ability to cut off supply lines to the NATO-led war effort in Afghanistan, to use in the standoff over BMD, but the United States could retaliate by supporting the current protests in Russia. Moscow is willing to escalate tensions with Washington but will not push the crisis to the point where relations could formally break.
Keyur Patel
High quality global journalism requires investment. Please share this article with others using the link below, do not cut & paste the article. See our Ts&Cs and Copyright Policy for more detail. Russia released a preliminary estimate for 2011 GDP growth on Tuesday - and at 4.3 per cent, it looks pretty healthy. The figure crept ahead of analyst expectations, buoyed by a strong recovery in consumer demand over the year, while 2010 growth was revised upwards, also to 4.3 per cent. Renaissance Capital was cautiously bullish, calling the forecast 'reason for a (modest) celebration'.
© "America-Russia.net". American-Russian alliance. All Rights Reserved.
Editorial Office in USA: 1800 Connecticut Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20009; Tel. 202-364-0200; Fax 240-554-1650; e-mail: russia@russiahouse.org
Site supported by: Kontinent USA and American University in Moscow ,2011
Rambler's Top100 Рейтинг@Mail.ru